Impact Of Reward System on Increasing Performance and Productivity.
All organizations are concerned with what should be done to
achieve sustained high levels of performance through people. Consequently, the
subject of adequate incentives for workers, as derived from the so many
attempts made by management practitioners, is to look for the best way to
manage so as to accomplish an objective or mission with the least inputs of
materials and human resources available
Certain problems of inadequate motivation however do arise
as it concerns certain individuals who come into the work situation with
differences in expectation, behavior and outlook. These problems of individual
motivation inadequately may be divided into two categories. Firstly, the
inability of certain individuals to be motivated may stem from the fact that
there is a deficiency in their personality
In spite of all these apparent attendant problems of
motivation, and productivity, every organization do necessarily seek means of
ensuring continuous productivity, which would be geared towards the
accomplishment of organization goals. The organizational system under study
cannot be said to be different in any way, in terms of producing the results
for which it was set up
Employee try to find satisfaction in what they do and as a
result the manager should be able to understand the problems faced by his
employees and find a way of satisfying their needs and aspiration. The general
assumption is that an adequately motivated worker will in turn give in his or
her best towards the attainment of a general consensus
Today managers cannot rely solely on the manipulation of
pay, benefit or working conditions to encourage workers to perform effectively
and efficiency. It is the duty of the manager to create and develop an
effective environment in which employee will be motivated to become productive
members of the organization by striving for what will bring them reward
Oosthuizen (2021) stated that it is among the function of
managers to motivate the employees successfully and influence their behavior to
achieve greater organizational efficiency. Motta (2018) is of the view that
performance at job is the result of ability and motivation. Ability formulated
through education, equipment, training, experience, ease in task and two types
of capacities i.e. mental and physical. The performance evaluation and rewards
are the factors that proved to be the bonding agents of the performance
evaluation programs
Entwistle (2017) is of the view that if an employee performs
successfully, it leads to organizational rewards and as a result motivational
factor of employees lies in their performance. Majority of the organizations
require their employees to work according to the rules and regulations, as well
as, job requirements that comply with full standards. The investigations that
have been conducted to find the relationship between compensation and
individuals were focused to increase the performance of employees. The highly
motivated employees serve as the competitive advantage for any company because
their performance leads an organization to well accomplishment of its goals.
Among financial, economical and human resources, human resources are more vital
that can provide a company competitive edge as compared to others. Commitment
of all employees is based on rewards and recognition. Prosperity and survival
of the organizations is determined through the human resources how they are
treated. Most of organizations have gained the immense progress by fully
complying with their business strategy through a well-balanced reward and
recognition programs for employee
Flynn (2018) argued that rewards and recognition programs
keep high spirits among employees, boosts up their morale and create a linkage
between performance and motivation of the employees. The rewards include the
financial rewards, pay and benefits, promotions and incentives that satisfy
employees to some extent but for committed employees, recognition must be given
to keep them motivated, appreciated and committed. Baron (2021) argued that
when we recognize and acknowledge the employees in terms of their
identification, their working capacity and performance is very high. Employees
are motivated fully when their needs are met. The level of motivation of
employees increases when employees get an unexpected increase in recognition,
praise and pay
Conclusion
Rewards play a vital role in determining the significant
performance in job and it is positively associated with the process of
motivation. There are two factors which determine how much a reward is
attractive, first is the amount of reward which is given and the second is the
weightage an individual gives to a certain reward. When employees experience
success in mentally challenging occupations which allows them to exercise their
skills and abilities, they experience greater levels of job satisfaction.
Promotions create the opportunity for personal growth, increased levels of
responsibility and an increase on social standing. Similarly, the recognition
which is a central point towards employee motivation adores an employee through
appreciation and assigns a status at individual level in addition to being an
employee of the organization.
References
Forker, 2020. Total Quality Management in the Supply
Chain: What is the Impact on Performance?. International Journal of
Production Research, 1(1), pp. 15-85.
Guest, 2021. Human Resource Management and
Industrial Relations. International Journal of Management Studies, 11(4),
pp. 31-34.
Narahari, 2019. A New Approach to Achieving Sharp
and Timely Deliveries in Supply Chain Networks. International Journal of
HRM, 1(1), pp. 61-72.
Patel, 2017. Performance measures and metrics in a
supply chain environment. International Journal of Operations and
Production Management, 5(1), pp. 41-58.
Tallon, 2022. Enhancing Supply Chain Practices
through Human Resource Management. The Journal of Management Development, 7(4),
pp. 17-35.

Comments
Post a Comment